In normal space, radical ideals and closed regions correspond one for one. We would like to make the same statement about homogeneous radical ideals and closed regions in projective space, and it's almost true. The only trouble occurs when two different homogeneous radical ideals, say H and J, lead to different closed regions in normal space (as they must), which become the same closed region in projective space. Let's see if this ever happens.
Assume R, in projective space, is nonempty, and H′ = J′ = R. Suppose p is a homogeneous polynomial in H, and not in J. Push J up to its radical ideal, which brings in every polynomial that vanishes on R, including p. Yet J is already a radical ideal, hence H contains J. By symmetry, J contains H, and H = J.
Now assume the region in projective space is empty. Suppose b is a point, other than the origin, that satisfies the homogeneous polynomials of H. The line determined by b satisfies H, and this is a contradiction. The only point that might vanish on H or J is the origin. So H and J could be different, if H′ is the origin (in normal space) and J′ is empty. The former is attained when H is the maximal ideal spanned by the indeterminants, with quotient field K. The latter is realized when J is the entire ring of polynomials.
To maintain a perfect correspondence, the radical ideal that is spanned by x1 through xn, denoted S+, is excluded from consideration. Without S+, homogeneous radical ideals and closed regions in projective space correspond one for one.
Remember that every proper homogeneous ideal is contained in S+. A chain of homogeneous prime ideals can always be augmented by 0 at the bottom, and S+ at the top.
As expected, a quasi variety is an open subset of a variety, according to the zariski topology of projective space.
Let the indeterminants x0 through xn build n dimensional projective space. Let a maximal ideal M vanish on a region R. Let R contain the point b with a nonzero coordinate x0 = b0. Let the n polynomials bi/b0*x0-xi generate the ideal W. These generators vanish on b, just like M. If W is a radical ideal, then W includes M, W = M, and we're done.
The generators represent n linearly independent equations in n+1 unknowns, hence the solution space is a line. We have already found this line; it is the point b in R. Thus W′ = b.
If one of the generators is 7x0-x3, map this over to the indeterminant y3. We don't need x3 in the destination ring; y3 will suffice. This is a ring isomorphism. Do this for all n generators and our ring is equivalent to K adjoin x0 and y1 through yn. The image of W is generated by y1 through yn, and the quotient is the integral domain K[x0]. Therefore W is prime. This makes W a radical ideal, and that completes the proof. Any additional functions, beyond W, would eliminate the point b. The maximal ideals inside S+, that correspond to individual points in projective space, have been characterized.
Let g = x2+y2 in a field where -1 is not a square, such as the reals or Z7. Try to factor g into two linear terms, which we can make monic, x+a times x+b. You'll see that a = -b, and a2 = -1, which doesn't work. Thus g generates a homogeneous prime ideal. g′ is empty (since 0 is not part of projective space), but that's because K is not closed. In C the closure of K we have two points x = ay and x = -ay. Over C, g would no longer be prime. Write it as the product of linear polynomials and each corresponds to one of the two projective points mentioned above.
In general, let C be the closure of K. Let g be homogeneous with both xd and yd. Use synthetic division to divide x-vy into g. The remainder is yd times a polynomial in v whose coefficients are determined by the coefficients of g. Since C is closed there is a v that makes the remainder 0. In other words, g factors, and it is not prime after all, unless it is linear. This defines a point in projective space. If there are two such generators, such as x+ay and x+by, they combine to span x and y, which is S+, which is maximal and prime. So we understand all the prime ideals over C[x,y]. Their images are all the points of projective space, and the empty space and the entire space.
Remember that the ring and the topology are noetherian. each closed set is the finite union of irreducible components, and each such component is a point, hence the zariski topology is the cofinite topology.
Return to the field K, and take images in projective space L, where K is a subfield of L is a subfield of C. Let g generate a prime ideal P, but g factors into a product of linear polynomials over C. These define at most d points in projective space over C, and perhaps a subset of these over L. Each closed set is finite, or it is the whole space. If K = L then each point is a closed component and we again have the cofinite topology. We saw this in one dimensional normal space as well.